Any reason your snark has to be obligatory? Especially since it's about a pedantic issue with the video about the service rather than the service itself?

The thing is, you've actually got something interesting to say -- we should certainly consider the privacy implications, and whether this could change limits on government intrusion into your correspondence -- but you buried the lead and presented it in a negative way for no clear reason other than you were feeling like being snarky toward someone's hard work.