Talk is cheap. It's very, very easy to criticize from afar when you have no skin in the game.
So, that type of criticism holds very little weight.
So, that type of criticism holds very little weight.
Talk is only cheap if you're lapping it up in bulk from poor sources. If talk were always cheap, advisory boards and mentors would never, ever provide any value. So by all means, throw it away; disregard people based on who they are and not what they say. It's your own loss.
Just have the decency not to mislead people who are looking for guidance with your own cheap talk.
Your parent is referring to perhaps (similar to) talking heads in a way that they get on TV not knowing all the facts or reasoning and state after the fact what should be.
But even if they state "before the fact" there is not a complete record of their thoughts on everything as being vetted as correct (success has a million fathers etc.)
So you can go back and say "see I said this was a bad idea" but what about the other 20 things someone says that you don't have the same outcome? You can just cherry pick. There is a common stock ruse that works this way. You call people up and say "I'm giving you a tip don't buy now". Then next month you call back all the people that you gave "tip a" to but not failed "tip b".
That said there is much to learn from criticism no matter where it comes from or what their axe is to grind etc.
do I need skin in the game to create a histogram? to do multiple regression? to get a hunch that something is foul? judgement and critical thinking have nothing to do with skin in the game. business is not lacrosse.
https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/brabble/id570281083?mt=8
Edited: 5 others. Forgot the Angel.
http://i.imgur.com/AcmcN53.png
While the site is responsive and making the window small so the left menu goes away fixes it, resizing to any amount larger than that results in some of the text being hidden off the right hand side.
Chrome Version 27.0.1453.94 m
neither do the execs, if they get paid anyway. (which was the point)