Where the Jobs Are in “Who Is Hiring” (June 2013)
iseld.org
iseld.org
Both your pie charts are a good example of how useful information is lost when you have more than a few categories. Both also make it hard to compare the relative magnitudes of smaller categories.
http://www.stevefenton.co.uk/Content/Pie-Charts-Are-Bad/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pie_chart#Use.2C_effectiveness_...
In the linear graph, the size of the U.S. column is so big that makes the sizes of the other countries difficult to see.
In the logarithmic graph () the sizes are too deformed, so it doesn't look good neither.
(() Is it even legal to use a logarithmic scale with percents??)
One thing I haven't been liking is it seems like most of the jobs are looking for worker bees. No one is looking for managers, directors, VP's, or even team leads. For those of us with over 15 years experience there didn't appear to be too many opportunities.
I posted for a Python developer to take over my contract in London doing interesting work for good pay and I've only had remote respondents. Surprised me a little.
So I'll say it again :) Can someone please take my job?
If you are offering 10% more than your competitors in terms of pay, you stand a better chance at recruiting talent away from other companies... if you offer a "senior" position at typical pay, you can't expect much.
Personally, I'm tempted to put on my outgoing voicemail (about half my inbound calls are recruiters) that I'm not interested in less than X in my local area or Y out of state. X being about 10% more than I currently make, and Y being 30% more (most areas recruiting, such as SF/SV cost that much more to even live there).
But other than that (which you wouldn't know unless you lived there) its awesome. I was curious about this information.
Is the Seattle scene not as big as I think it is? Or are they just not hiring (through this channel)?
I'd tend to say startups should initially recruit from their own networks; for founders just leaving a school, or with strong ongoing connections to a school, that's great, but getting someone with 2-5+ years of experience means a lot more in a startup than it would at a big company with enough structure. A fresh college graduate with some independent project/startup experience is entirely different from the 50th percentile CS grad from a good-academically-but-not-amazing program, though.
The technical reputation definitely comes from Microsoft and Amazon being headquartered here, along with branches for eBay, Google, and Facebook.
Does Nintendo count for anything?
There is a lot of tech talent in Seattle, and even more demand for it, but there seems to be a lack of VC money looking for startups to invest in. It just isn't really the model here.
Seattle's tech job market also heavily favors large, entrenched players - the same folks who aren't advertising on HN.
Breaking up the jobs by level and 'specialty' would be useful.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5803764
Edit: I was completely wrong. My apologies. I'll keep the original comment in place. The subject was a bit misleading, but still, mea culpa.
Good for you. Have an upvote.
Everyone of us has fired off a comment in haste that we wish we could get back.
It happens. It's actually good that it happens. It usually means that you'll atleast be aware that you are about to do it next time:)
Hover over an area of the graph or list, and that section of the graph is highlighted.
Hover over the graph and amplifying text appears.
Click on the graph or list and a persistent marker for that part of the graph is displayed.
I kinda wonder if that's mostly Boulder though, seems like most of the startup action is in Boulder (TechStars is there, of course).