Hacker News Reader

Comment by hcarvalhoalves | Hacker News Reader

It's not patent trolling unless the company suing makes a living out of it. Apple actually makes some stuff, you know.

A company is not a "patent troll" unless the company makes a living only doing it. However, what Apple brought against Samsung and what is being described here is a pretty clear-cut case of patent trolling.

It is not clear cut at all. Your bias is showing.

It's not patent trolling if you sue based on patents you implemented in your own products either. That's the whole point of the patent system, dammit.

I don't think you know what patent trolling means, neither how patents work.

Click this patent[1]. Click "Original document". Tell me with a straight face that this is not patent trolling.

They patented "the ornamental design for an electronic device" which is a "thin rectangular cuboid with rounded corners"[2]. Tell me with a straight face this is the point of the patent system.

[1] http://worldwide.espacenet.com/textdoc?DB=EPODOC&IDX=USD...

[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Inc._v._Samsung_Electroni...

This is an industrial design patent, and there are many like that. [1] Try coping the Coke bottle and you´ll be sued. Try coping the iPhone and you´ll be sued. Simple.

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Design_patent

You do not understand the term "patent trolling". Give up.

So you _do_ think that this is a valid, enforceable patent that represents how the system _should_ work?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com