Is that true? "Minimize the number of arguments" nudges you towards datatypes or maps instead of lists of implicitly related variables. No state there, just keeping functions relatively simple in terms of their inputs.

In the latter case, "avoid output arguments" is absolutely a principle of functional programming; it says use arguments for input and return values for output. You can't do this in Haskell. I don't think you can do it in Clojure, either, or if you can, it's not really idiomatic b/c immutable. I can't speak to other Lisps with any certainty, but I've never seen it as an idiom.