I disagree, people say my flat designs look great.
Even if one can produce only average looking flat designs, it may be a good idea to do that, because flat design has a high cost / value ratio.
I disagree, people say my flat designs look great.
Even if one can produce only average looking flat designs, it may be a good idea to do that, because flat design has a high cost / value ratio.
Lots of people would also say otherwise, simply by virtue of them being flat. They look like stunted half designs, lacking the the visual cues and polish that make application UX intuitive and understandable.
Let's say you can A) spend 1 hour implementing some sorting algorithm or B) spend 10 hours implementing a 1% faster sorting algorithm. Most of the time A) is better, more economical thing to do. But there are of course situations where B) is better, for example, when the 1% improvement will result in $1M increase in profits. (A = flat design, B = non-flat design.)