You miss the point: It's not that all the
versions of Islam and Islamic governments
are alike. Instead, it's that in the more
backward Islamic countries, Islam is essentially
all the culture there is. And Islam is not
just a religion but is also into law,
government, education, etc. So, in such a country, Islam
is about all the culture there is and can
block, actively or just passively by default,
essentially all progress.
As you point out, there are still some differences.
But what is in common is that Islam, in whatever
flavors, is so strong, and not just a
religion, and essentially all the
culture there is, is able to block progress.
Look, to be more clear, the problem is not
just Islam. Instead, the Roman Catholics ran
everything in Western Europe for hundreds of
years, were corrupt, blocked progress, and
finally Europe got out of it, after religious wars,
etc.
The point is not that Islam is a bad religion,
even if it is. Instead the point is that to
run a good society, need a good culture, and that
culture needs to come from much more than just
some religious clerics. A religious state,
Roman Catholic, Islamic, or anything else, just
will not be a successful state. In the countries
where Islam is the only culture, Islam needs
to shrink back to being just a religion, hopefully
one of several, and let the culture have other
inputs besides just religion. Got it now?