Garbage article with intentionally deceitful title. This shouldn't even be on HN. If there were a down vote button, I'd be clicking it ferociously.
"He says science, not religion, resurrected the afterlife. Advances in cardiopulmonary resuscitation meant that patients who would have died were revived, and many had stories to share."
Regardless, I don't see why you consider it a "garbage article". It seems well-written to me.
There's no downvote for submissions, but there is a flag button. I don't know if there's a karma threshold for that.