How did you reach that conclusion? Did you start from the idea that the course is nothing but a get-rich-quick scheme and therefor no one could benefit from it and the blog post must be a sham?

Do you think that he didn't do what he said or that he is maybe getting some consideration from Ramith Sethi or something?

To my naive eye they guy seems to have written a post about a course of action that he is happy with and has given him some success. Is that so hard to believe? It doesn't that deleting your portfolio is the best course of action, it's just what he did.

Or is it the emphasis on revenue that rubs you the wrong way?

I'm asking all these questions because I just can't wrap my head around the negative reaction.