This is the most tangential and unnecessary thing I've read on HN all the years that I've been here.
I mean, DOH! Your XXX candid shots will stay in your hard drive, how is that a surprise or relevant to the discussion?
This is the most tangential and unnecessary thing I've read on HN all the years that I've been here.
I mean, DOH! Your XXX candid shots will stay in your hard drive, how is that a surprise or relevant to the discussion?
Lots of people will have _some_ photos that would be a bad idea to post on Flickr. Anyone with children, for example, will certainly have photos that obviously shouldn't appear on a public website.
Which means there's a very large set of people who can't save _everything_ on Flickr, and since the original post said 'I have ditched iPhoto as my archiving software', it seems completely relevant.
We, "language challenged" don't need it spelt out thank you, we got it the first time.
It's not what the comments says we find problematic, is why he deemed it relevant to say it. I mean since it goes without saying that this situation applies to some people, and that not everybody can share everything in Flickr.
It's like posting on an article about a cool new email client, and somebody commenting "Alas, I can't use this for everything I mail, because a lot of that are physical packages, not just emails". Well, duh!
>I realize this country was founded by religious zealots he'll bent on eliminating any fun, but it's a fact of life that a lot of people have naked photos!
Well, that was not my issue with his comment. For one, I could not care less -- I'm from another country, and I won't even raise an eyebrow for people having naked photos (or any kind of fun for that matter).