The Scoutzie founders were very nice and understanding people to work with throughout the whole process and I'm sure this new product will be a success.
PS: I'm glad the site works fine without Javascript enabled.
The Scoutzie founders were very nice and understanding people to work with throughout the whole process and I'm sure this new product will be a success.
PS: I'm glad the site works fine without Javascript enabled.
Who does this and why? Do you like browsing the web where 80% of website's functionality is broken because you think its a good idea to browse with JavaScript disabled. Makes no sense.
18.28 (nojs) vs 21.45 (w/js) bits of identifying information using Chrome.
I'm one of them. I do this because of malicious adverts and because of tracking systems. These cost privacy, but also real money (a well-publicized exampple is ordering airline tickets)
> Do you like browsing the web where 80% of website's functionality is broken because you think its a good idea to browse with JavaScript disabled. Makes no sense.
I agree, it wouldn't make sense if people liked broken websites, and I'm pretty sure that they don't. But I think what you mean is that I should enable JS because it is in wide use. For me, that is not a good enough reason.
As a former web application developer, I do believe that most of those websites could do fine without JS!