Something Meaningful
blog.coffeestrap.com
blog.coffeestrap.com
Anyway, when I first moved to a new city, I tried doing the whole 'language tandem' thing, which, by the way, is not a popular phrase in the US. In fact, many people don't understand what that is. People usually call it 'language exchange'. At least in my experience.
Anyway, I used http://conversationexchange.com.
It was frustrating. But it depends what you wanted out of it. I wanted to genuinely learn a language, but had heard a lot of people use it to date.
It didn't work out for me because I was a beginner, and I needed a little more structure. The people who I met just wanted to 'chat', with no real learning material. And many didn't even know what books to recommend.
I think it would've been better if there would've been two people who genuinely wanted to learn a language and were at the same level. But even then, switching back and forth from teacher to student is challenging, especially amongst beginners.
I think it worked out great when both parties had sufficient knowledge to not use a book, and were just learning vocabulary and a small set of new rules.
I'm still a bit confused too, but I think it's because I'm American: the terms "language exchange" and "tandem learners" don't mean anything here.
So is it like: say I'm fluent in English and conversational in German; I'd meet up with someone who's fluent in German and conversational in English, and we'd help each other learn? Is that the idea?
So far for example here in San Francisco we have a lot of people willing to learn Mandarin(or actually speaking! I am looking at you Zack! :) ) and fluent in English. Another trend here in the bay is about Korean/Japanese. And a lot of Spanish speakers and Portuguese as well. Those are the main languages so far!
Fortunately, your main page is VERY clear on this main goal. Well done! It makes me wish I were trying to learn a language, as I expect that there's not much use for someone who only speaks English.
Two quick suggestions, though. First, In this blog post, every one of your images is a guy and a girl together. kafkaesque and others expressed confusion about whether or not there was a dating overtone. Maybe this is adding to the confusion?
Second, please get some new icons for the male/female indicators in the sign up process. If you need icons instead of text, just use the standard gender symbols with some pink/blue as an added indicator. Maybe I'm dumb, but it took me a long time to realize that the leaf-looking things on the side of the girl's head were pigtails.
Okay, so it's intended. I'm sure this will be followed by an explanation.
> in order to collect feedback
Doesn't really explain the male/female pairings.
> and understand how to handle UX & UI in situations that would otherwise be prone for confusion!
Maybe I'm off my rocker today, but that doesn't really explain the start of the sentence. The only thing I'm getting here is that the pairings are intentional.
You're not off your rocker. I'd imagine that I'm just as confused.
(1) I'm definitely not conversational in any language other than English. (I'm very slowly working on Japanese, but I haven't really built up much vocabulary or much of the grammar. I'm less driven about learning than I probably should be, but I figure I can continue to work on it this slowly until I get to a certain point.) Have you had any stores of people with differing relative skills doing a language exchange?
(2) I live in a not-quite-densely-populated area (Amarillo, Texas), so I can only wonder how vibrant the CoffeeStrap user-base here would be. There's really no solution to this one other than to sign up and try to start something myself. It's what really kills me about living out here and seeing all of these cool services, but I suppose it comes with the territory.
(1) yes language proficiency is definitely one variable that inputs in our matching algorhitm (2) you never know, we are now observing CoffeeStrappers signing up form VERY remote areas of the world. of course more dense of CS is your area, more accurate matches you will have, but I wouldn't say you are apriori condemned to a Japanless CS future if you keep on living in Amarillo! :-)
More importantly, I didn't feel like I was learning every day. Much of the work is absurdly repetitive.
I started learning how to build web applications and found it more mentally rewarding... but what are the ramifications of that for research? It's incredibly important but not seen as very exciting these days.
Edit: In my Firefox it's broken too. Turns out only Chrome renders it legibly.
As "defense" of PhDs program I could say that it definitely trains your mind to look at things with a deeper perspective.
This can lead people, such as myself, to investigate the value of a PhD itself and find that the career prospects, financial rewards, and even intellectual rewards, are difficult to align/justify.
I think that a reasonable conclusion is indeed that switching fields would generally be a good move, unless you know yourself to be an outstanding researcher within your field of expertise.
There is also the isolation factor. Many people do work in groups, and many people do work closely with their advisor. But, in the end, the student is expected to own some research themselves. That is the work that is the core of their thesis. Requiring the student to own some significant piece of work on their own contributes to the pressure people put on themselves, and the isolation they tend to feel.
Hopefully you find the technical person you need to help execute your idea...it's not just tech expertise you need, but someone who understands and buys into your idea well enough to see how tech can make it uniquely (and practically) executable.