Malware warning is correct

I think that when an editor changes a post's title, there should be visibility (e.g. who made the change, why the change, if enough karma what original title way.)

This title completely spikes the entire story that's actually happening. Cutts certainly didn't have to go to the depth he did in responding to a conspiracy theory thrown his way - but he did, and he did it with style. There's a lot more lesson here than "Malware warning is correct", but now most HNers won't know that.

Hmmm, Dvorak? Is he still a thing? If so, why would anyone read him? There's so many, many more interesting pundits, pundits who have things to say, and can back them up with pictures, citations, etc etc.