I don't even know where to start pointing out what is wrong with THAT...
I don't even know where to start pointing out what is wrong with THAT...
Now maybe I was just unlucky, but Washington DC, and rural Virginia, Maryland and Pennsylvania are hardly considered hotspots of trouble (well, maybe DC, but I was in the nice parts of town!)
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_incarceration_ra...)
That "relatively" is important.
(In 2009)
US: 743 per 100,000
Russia: 577 per 100,000
China: 120 per 100,000
Canada: 117 per 100,000
Compared to other countries the chances of an American going to prison are higher, even though the chances overall are quite low.(http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/04/23/8th-grader-suspen...)
(http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/21/student-nra-shirt_n...)
It's difficult to know what happened, but something like a child wears an NRA t-shirt to school; people ask him to change it; he refuses; the discipline escalates; police are called.
The HuffPo article says something about a disruption. Usually children are disruptive because the adult in the situation allows them to be disruptive. Ignore the shirt and there's no disruption. Ask him to leave the class and there's no disruption. (I'm not sure of the situation. Maybe he's standing on the desks and yelling about his First Amendment Rights. (And maybe if he wrote a 1,000 word essay on the first amendment and how it protects speech and why Americans love it so much the school may chose to relax the punishment.)
I understand that there may be times when schools need to call the police. A child with a weapon is capable of killing; a child breaking criminal laws needs to be dealt with.
But, assuming this child stayed calm during the sequence, I can't understand why the police are involved.
If I'd had my house or car burgled and I read this I'd be pretty annoyed that police were spending time on this stuff and not actual crimes.