"If this hypothesis is correct, then the next time you relish the scent of fresh rain, think of it as a cultural imprint, derived from your ancestors."

This is challenging the intelligence of it's readers. I thought that was actually the whole point of the article, and the premise rather than a doubtful conclusion? It spends the majority of it's paragraphs discussing what compounds the smell, which while really interesting, does not at all help explain why it smells good. Oh, so it's some oils, so what? Oils can smell greasy and funny. There's no such thing as a scent being inherently "good." It's all a product of our evolution.