So even when he doesn't do anything he still gets credit for the end result?
If what Jobs achieved is so easy, go and do it...
Your comment was insinuating that the success of Pixar's portfolio was somehow a testament to Jobs. Would it really have been any different had they gotten funding from a completely different source? You even said he didn't "meddle", so other than a financial investment, any credit awarded him for the quality of their work should be minimal.
There are plenty of things he can and should get credit for -- we don't need to retroactively add more.