A Senate in the Gun Lobby’s Grip
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
I applaud the senate for not enacting this obviously knee-jerk legislation.
When logic prevails, we all win.
This argument can be used against anything: Any man is law abiding until the point he starts beating his wife. Therefore we should have surveillance cameras in all houses...
Also, the Supreme Court, 9 to 0, agreed that the dependent clause was irrelevant, and that the "individual" vs. "collective" interpretation was correct. They of course disagreed on what rights it confers, but the collective interpretation is as dead as can be (a terrible outcome from the millions of dollars the Joyce Foundation invested into trying to establish it).
Divide ut regnes.