Prince Rupert's Drop
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
2. Let it cool down, take it out.
3. Hammer the head of the drop and it won't break.
4. Nick the thin tail and the whole thing will explode.
Here's a GIF - http://i.imgur.com/opyMkMx.gif
Here's the vid - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xe-f4gokRBs#t=104s
The story linked is just a blog wrapper on a "Smarter Every Day" episode, which is definitely worth watching.
Smarter Every Day: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xe-f4gokRBs
1. That guy's smile always makes my day better. 2. You learn cool shit.
TheRoyalInstitution (science stuff, professionally done)
periodicvideos (excellent channel, chemistry stuff)
numberphile (math)
minutephysics (physics)
sixtysymbols (physics/math stuff)
DeepSkyVideos (space stuff, not updated often)
psyfile (psychology, not updated often)
engineerguyvideo (was really good, now rarely updates)
computerphile (brand new channel, no content yet, from same guys as the other *phile channels)
and for fun: JoergSprave (the slingshot guy, but his creations are quite cool if you like physics)
More of a historical question, since there's clearly no obvious demand for a weapon that requires the ability to produce glass in a world where chemical explosives are comparatively easy to obtain. But, I'm sure there are places and times in history where glass manufacture was practiced and the knowledge of and ability to obtain chemical explosives was more limited.
Or, I suppose it might not be that dangerous. My understanding of "safety glass" is that by being tempered, it also utilizes internal stresses similarly to both strengthen the glass and ensure that, if broken, it breaks into smaller less harmful pieces rather than large sharp shards. So, I suppose it might make sense if it didn't cause that much harm, and was more like throwing sand at someone...
Mind you, these kind of drops are more stylized straight versions, so I'm not sure if they do have the same properties.