Now that's fanboyism at its worst. I mean, equating A with something X when it is not clear, how even remotely similar those are, but where X conveniently failed some time ago.
But to reply in kind, how are greenbacks these days?
But to reply in kind, how are greenbacks these days?
The OC argument to seems to be, bitcoin and beany babes are expression of the same idea and beanie babes flopped. Ergo bitcoin will fail.
Hence the question about greenbacks, which are now not worth a continental.
Yes, you can say that greenbacks are doing great, comparatively speaking, but than if greenbacks ~= dollars and beanie babies ~= bitcoins, than you are bound to say that.. beanie babies are at least moderately successful
Which if I understood the OC correctly it is exactly the opposite of what was implying.
Cheers