* This is a report from a third person who have talked with the lawers representing StockArt.
* The two lawyers of StockArt claim they did not sue anyone, and that they were trying to contact Jon since the thing blew up.
* Lawers claim they did not "harass" Jon's client, but contacted two of them to check if they also "had legitimate licensing rights" from Jon's work.
* The dispute started when Jon uploaded 65 logos on a second site "LogoPond". Laywers claim that Logopond, the site, was launched in 2006 while a few of the logos in question are in StockArts pocesson for a decade. (I don't know if that says anything)
* And that they previously had once claimed right on Jon's work and Jon actually paid the bill.
Update: as davidmathers have pointed out here is the site page with comparison:
http://www.thelogofactory.com/logo_blog/stock.html
For quick summary seekers: Scroll bellow. The browser window at the bottom is Jon's work. The popup is from StockArt's artists. Note that every art from StockArt belongs to a different artist whos name is linked in the center of the popup window. This evidence strongly goes against Jon. Either these 20 artiest with reputation copied from Jon (unlikely) or Jon copied from them.