The point he makes about the iPhone 5 not being received well seems to contradict the entire point of the article. If the iPhone 5 wasn't received well by name alone (after all, it doesn't have an "S"), why should the iPhone 6 be?
Samsung... 4?! That's 2 BEHIND LOSERS! i-f-ing-Phone-6.
Apoplectic at the first blogger that says, "They should called it 5S. Me disappointer."