In Defense of the Floppy Disk Save Symbol
connortomas.com
connortomas.com
The floppy disk on the other hand ... well sure we still use magnetic medium to save data on a daily basis without even thinking about it, but there might be only a couple generation that would have knowingly handled such a device. It makes sense for them. But for our parents and children? It is quite an abstraction that 'saving' needs to have a symbol on its own pretty much like the 'on/off' switch does: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_symbol.
Just pretend the floppy disk never existed, and that the floppy-save symbol is just a completely abstract symbol. Doesn't it still work? As long as a symbol is unique, easy to identify, and easy to reproduce, it does its job. I'd argue that floppy symbol has stuck around because, on a purely visual level, it's hard to beat.
If one take the idea of saving outside the computing world (meaning where the computer is used on a daily basis), then I see two choices for the representation: a bank safe as the old age mean to save (money or valuable in this case) or a folder for document (dead tree medium are not going to die any time soon). I think that a study needs to be done among non computing educated people to understand better what is their mental (pictural) representation of the action of saving is.
All I am saying is that the floppy disk is pretty much a cultural centric representation of the action of saving valuable information for later retrieval.
Any replacement for the floppy would need to be immediately recognisable and not already tied symbolically to another concept. My argument, simply, is that I don't think there's anything better. The floppy is a unique shape and conceptually tied only to "saving". The effort required to move away from a commonly-used symbol isn't trivial and I just don't think there's much to be gained.
Surely one could make the same arguments about bank safes and paper folders, to a certain extent?