Catching up with Watsi: Y Combinator’s first non-profit graduate
thenextweb.com
thenextweb.com
Funded treatments: 261
Treatments waiting for funds to transfer: 124
Average wait for funds: 43 days
Data and script for calculations can be found here: https://gist.github.com/kyleconroy/5332776But in short, it's for two reasons. 1) We transfer funds after care is provided (details in the FAQ) and 2) It takes an average of six weeks for care to be provided, which IMO is actually extremely fast considering the context in which our medical partners operate.
If you still have questions after reading the FAQ and associated blog post, happy to answer them here. That said, I really appreciate the analysis of our transparency doc. Crowdsourcing operational feedback is exactly why we make our data public.
The only other thing that stuck out looking over the document were patient updates. There are a few patients, specifically Madeline[1], whose treatment is still in progress but haven't seen an update in over five months. It would be great if you could ensure that no patient would go without an update for more than two months.
In Madeline's case, the surgery is taking longer than anticipated because she had some unanticipated dental issues that her doctors wanted to take care of before they operated.
Because of limited resources, we usually prioritize sending "final" updates over "preliminary" ones, but you're right that in Madeline's case we definitely need to prioritize keeping her donors posted on the reason for the delay.
As Chase mentioned, this kind of crowdsourced spot checking is exactly why we make all of our records public. Thanks for bringing this up!
“[Watsi’s] goal is to become the largest crowdfunding medical treatment platform. This is way down the line, but we could move into providing social medical insurance. As soon as we have large enough dollars coming through the platform, we could even treat patients in the USA.”
The first time I visited the Watsi site, seeing all those photos and reading the stories of people in need of medical care, I thought of the many people I know in the US who have little or no health insurance. Well educated, hard working people who can't afford medication and common medical procedures, people who haven't been to a dentist in years, and so on.
I understand that in developing countries more can be done for more people with the same funds, but I'd be very happy if this project took off in such a way that it would let the world help the US population in need. It might be more realistic than waiting for the implementation of a healthcare system deserving of a first world nation.
It is the same with that IndieGoGo fund the other day to help the Kenyan hacker trying to get to NYC for Hacker School. There is something fulfilling about refreshing that page and seeing the goal met and then exceeded and knowing it will impact their life in a way that is greater than I could have impacted my own by spending the same money on something for myself (or, perhaps, something more directly for myself, since clearly this kind of thing gives me some personal satisfaction or I wouldn't do it, selfish altruism and all :))
Even more important is engagement because nonprofit usually have multiple missions. Watsi shouldn't just "get the money to the people" as a business oriented mind would think about their model. Engage donors to give money and understand the situation of the people receiving the money, and the situation of their city, the public health system in their country, how their families and neighborhoods deal with health issues. These are the things that will make the world smaller and the humans closer. A big VC writing a check of 100,000 dollars won't acomplish anything on that, 10,000 people giving 10 bucks each month, a reading their newsletter, understanding more about the world. That is an accomplishment.
pg's post welcoming Watsi : http://ycombinator.com/watsi.html
Watsi seems like an amazing opportunity to resolve these issues- are you guys looking for interns or volunteers?