Hacker News Reader

Comment by wildermuthn | Hacker News Reader

Technology is not neutral. Technologies are designed for discrete purposes. A hammer is designed for, among other things, hammering nails, not eating. And as it has been said, "When all you have is a hammer, all your problems look like nails." A CIA drone is not a neutral technology.

Kevin Kelly (a former editor of Wired) wrote a book called "What Technology Wants." He reminds us that technology does have a purpose, does influence human behavior, and may in fact be changing human nature.

Kudos to the OP for taking a reflective, responsible, and principled stance. We should all be so discriminating.

View on HN

Technology is morally neutral. To use your own examples, a hammer could be used to build a house or commit a murder, and a drone could be used for aerial strikes or to monitor endangered animals for poaching activity (http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2013/01/2013117135...). The initial use case for a technology to be developed will always be shaped by the morals and intent behind it, but other uses can always be found that are good or bad no matter what the technology is.

I don't agree with you or Kevin Kelly. A hammer might be designed for hammering nails, but you can beat someone to death with a hammer or use it to build a house. A drone that is used to kill people can easily be turned to other purposes; consider the fact that satellite photography was once used primarily for espionage and military target identification, but has since become an invaluable tool for everything from mapping services to environmental observation. We wouldn't have been able to properly observe things like deforestation in the Amazon, the ozone hole, or shifting temperature gradients without this military-originated technology.

Kelly has interesting points to make about path-dependency, but I don't share his teleological viewpoint, though having said that I've only read extracts and essays by him rather than the full book.

The point is that what something was designed for is irrelevant compared to what it ends up being used for.

A steak knife is designed to cut meat during a pleasant, community event: eating dinner together. I can still use it to kill you.

Kind of splitting hairs, but a "CIA drone" is an application, not a technology. Drones as a technology are morally neutral.

You can politicize anything, but sometimes a video codec is just a video codec. As opposed to a "remote surveillance and murder technology".

Reply on news.ycombinator.com