Absolutely. However, a public office bullying a neutral agency in to deleting 'information with notability' i.e. public information is certainly suspicious.
Nothing proves that DCRI wanted to delete public or notable information. There were speculations over the current use of this station on the wikipedia page. Obviously, they were not sourced, and probably, this is classified information.
> Nothing proves that DCRI wanted to delete public or notable information.
Why the hoopla then?
Nothing proves, but everything points to the DCRI.
They are like the big child standing with a lollipop in their hand next to the screaming baby.
OK, I was not clear. Nothing proves that the data was public or notable.
It sure is public and notable now.
Apparently the original article is quite of international significance. Can we get an English version thereof?
In fact, that's perhaps the best mode of action now: to propagate the article in all other languages.