Facebook Home – What Can Go Wrong
andrewmunsell.com
andrewmunsell.com
Term: Facebook IQ
Definition: The floor function of the IQ of the set containing all of your Facebook "friends"... and all of their friends.
In plain terms, on Facebook you can never be any smarter than the stupidest of your friends (to the second degree).
Do you think that is invariably true? I learn a lot from a lot of my Facebook friends. One of those friends calls my wall the "PBS of Facebook" (a reference to the public television network in the United States) because we mostly discuss links (some of which I see first here on HN) and have thoughtful discussions of research and policy issues. Sure, once in a while one of us passes around a photoshopped picture with a silly caption, but most of the time we keep things intellectually engaging and civil, much like HN at its best. (Just a few of my Facebook friends are also members of the HN community.) I think the atmosphere of a group of Facebook friends can be shaped by example, just like any other local culture.
I guess he is not referring to an entire time-line of incidents and taking an average out of that. But the isolated lows and highs. Minimums and maximums. Read it as a friend posting an image with a sensational and stupid caption posing it as a video which leads to a link to a spam site, now imagine that friend doing it again again(marking it spam/hiding doesn't work - Facebook gives you the option just to screw with you). Now, imagine a friend posting sth not stupid, like an informative link or a question or s statement or his thoughts that sparks a very healthy discussion - this is extremely rare on Facebook, unlike HN and Quora(better still). You've got your high and low.
It's an entirely different aspect if you have a highly curated list of Facebook friends. Spam haters, privacy aficionados(can't think why they would be on Fb), thinkers, minimalists etc etc. Or simply your (all, without even curating the friend list) friends are just what I have mentioned above. You are lucky because mine aren't and I don't know anyone whose are.
Twitter is a pub sub model, it doesn't really make sense to want to sub but not sub. Twitter follows aren't like friendships at all, they're a "I want to see your content" marker.
There are certain pros and cons -- differeing levels of convenience being one of them -- of every communications medium and your response completely ignores that.
Your friend completely trashed with markings on him? His friend like that?
I have gone from facebook for coming up on two years, but I see some of the pictures posted on my girlfriends feed. A good portion (she is a college student) are pictures of fairly messy nights out.
Even if its not toilet pictures, a picture of a drunk, scantily clad teenager may not look any better, and these pictures dominate facebook. At least the feeds of young people that I know.
I had a situation like this where I was away on business, and ended up at a bar with a guy I worked with. He asked to borrow my phone for a minute to check something online.
So I give him the phone without thinking, I would feel like a bit of a dick saying no.
When he hands me the phone back and I go to the homescreen I find I have a new message, turns out it's a colourful message from a lady friend.
Then it suddenly hits me that whenever I receive a new message it automatically scrolls across the top of the screen..
These of course is not the case for everyone, but everyone has different experience, but most of the time we don't want to see what our friends post on our homepage. Either people will get used to it, like Timeline, or the app will be a failure.
It's definitely not a problem with Home, but it's definitely exaggerated when you use Home.
On the other hand, if it actually is easy for you, then you could make a LOT of money as a contractor. :)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/facebook/9118778/The-d...