- License the complete .NET stack under an Apache license.
- Disclose the patents they allege Linux infringes.
- Apologize for what they did to ISO.
- Make the ability to add personal keys to secure boot a requirement for having a Windows logo.
- Disclose the patents they allege Linux infringes.
- Apologize for what they did to ISO.
- Make the ability to add personal keys to secure boot a requirement for having a Windows logo.
Sigh, that's already the requirement.
If I had a cent for every poster that is ignorant about secure boot but rants against it as if they are a guru, I'd be very rich. Why so many tech savvy folks are clueless when it comes to Secure Boot, I will never know. These facts are known from over a year, but the FUDsters have succeeded in fudging the facts and spreading mistruths.
Great, how do I do this on my Windows Surface (ARM) device?
It seems I have an odd sample over my desk. There are 4 ARM-based devices on it, all of them are unlocked.
To add your keys? While some entities have found ways to circumvent the "secure boot" method, I never saw a way to add my own keys to my Dell laptop so I could sign my own bootloader.
http://blog.hansenpartnership.com/owning-your-windows-8-uefi...