This is a great example of exactly the kind of opinion-setting Bruce is talking about. I think it's pretty clear that services like Google are hardly optional in this day in age, especially when it comes to making a living i.e. eating, which brings us right back to the feudalism allegory.

There's nothing to disagree with in the OP's comment or your comment. Because they are just refusing to accept any of the facts of the article. It's pointless to engage you because you will never try to directly refute evidence, but will instead attempt to distract and dramatize. I've seen this rhetorical style a million times; it's very formulaic.

This kind of head-in-the-sand, denial-comment like the OP is exactly the same rhetorical style that Israel used in the Lebanon war on Reddit. Is the OP an actual agent with opinion setting agenda? Does it matter? Our only option is to be aware of common fallacious argument methods, and do our research.