Raspberry Pi Model A (the $25 one) finally on sale in US
arstechnica.com
arstechnica.com
Shameless plus as I just wrote a post about my project this weekend. http://itsbrent.net/2013/03/hacking-my-garage-with-a-raspber...
Which means it's not really on sale for $25 in the US.
I could make the same claim myself, that I am selling them for $25, don't have any in stock, and don't accept backorders. They wouldn't make it really for sale unless I am actually accepting $25 and shipping out boards. It might be convenient though if I give people a link to where I am selling other items, that's a lot of free incoming traffic without having to pay Google for AdSense clicks.
This is just cheap dishonest advertising for the company. A lot of people visiting the link will buy something else. Someone there has figured out a good way to make money is send out press releases to the tech press about their desirable but unavailable non-sale item, and hope for a bite. They got a bite - Cyrus Farivar at ArsTechnica fell for it. Sure, they had 50 in stock that were sold instantly. 50 that this company no doubt bought for more than $25 each and either sold as a loss leader, or simply charged more for shipping than they paid.
That's not to say you shouldn't get a Raspberry Pi, quite the opposite - just don't let the lack of one stop you from doing what you want, today!
If you want to keep a machine around that you know doesn't do much, it's the cheapest option on AWS. But it's no fun if you're doing unplanned, interactive work. Even for the first use case, you want to fire up a bigger instance to do things like package installation, then restart as a micro once its configured.
(* I experienced this a year ago. Others report similar things.)
HN discussion https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5293098
So just a tiny server running Linux with an ethernet port. I you can get the pi down to $25 you could probably get such a thing down to $15 or so.
The ethernet was expensive because it consisted of two components, an ethernet chip and a usb hub. A cool side effect of the hub not being in the A is that you can use it as a USB slave too. This is very handy if you want to use the Pi to make a pheripheral device.
There must be some cost saving in just removing the video connectors from the board, though I'm not sure if it's any cheaper to get an ARM CPU without an inbuilt GPU.
You would also have to add connectors for antennas.
Close though, and I suspect we'll see SOC's that target this market soon enough. One workaround is a development environment that lets you compile a Linux application into something that can run on the hardware (just the kernel you need, and nothing extra :-) The uC Linux work is interesting in this regard.
PS. It hurts to think that I am not buying it(B) because it costs ~$60 here(IN) and the original price being $35. Maybe I would have bought it if it was released for $60 and available here for the same cost. Played with it at a friend's place though.
I have a Model B with a connected HDD that's been on 24x7 for a few months now. No problems so far. I don't expect a big difference between the Model A and B wrt stability.