This is because with the advent of these machines also our hygiene habits changed. We wash a lot more than before, and therefore there is no time saving but cleaner clothes.
The same is true for computers. They did not save time, they changed the way we treat information. We have a lot more than before to process.
That's not true. The ratio is not at all the same. Except if you take something like 17th century hygiene habits (and for the poor classes, at that) and compare it to modern day habits.
But we had the frequent clothes washing far before the advent of the washing machine. Not to mention that what you said could also be solved with bigger washing machines and more clothing (so that you can still wash at longer intervals, but you have stuff to wear in between).
What if you reverse this and apply it to computers? I spend maybe 2-3 hours in Excel every week. If I were born 100 years earlier, would it follow that I'd also spend 2-3 hrs/wk making spreadsheets, albeit at a much slower work pace? It seems doubtful. I've got only a few dozen sheets, tops. Lots of time spent in Excel is tweaking, making things line up / look right, updating kludges, etc. Busywork, basically. Maybe this is my fault; the 'math' tells me I should have lots of sheets, but I get caught up doing busywork on this machine that's supposed to automate the whole ordeal. What a scam!
The answer therefore is yes.
With endemic spreadsheet errors (since the 80s), and far better solutions being ignored (also since the 80s), there's certainly something to rant about! ;-)
You have to wait of few hundred years to see all the consequences of technology in retrospect.