How can a drug work LESS than a placebo? Like if the drug does nothing then it should at least be as effective as a placebo shouldn't it?
Treatment is harsh and aggressive and carries risks and has unpleasant side effects.
In that case doing nothing is better than doing something.
A very good question to ask of a doctor is "What happens if I do nothing?"
That's why it's important to publish all trials - if the 20 people who got better anyway were receiving the active drug do you think they would be saying our drug might not be that effective?