Is Twitter Killing RSS?
jeffnolan.com
jeffnolan.com
Twitter serves a different purpose than blogs, Facebook status updates, etc. If you're shoehorning all your content into all possible channels for attention, well that's just spammy.
Even create multiple twitter acounts by topic.
But when I follow a regular twitter account I expect short, self-contained tidbits. When people decide to leverage their twitter followers to get traffic to other services, that's what I find annoying.
It's a bit of a weird article. He's conflating notification mechanism with social network. What does it mean to kill RSS? Every blogger now uses a tweet widget instead of RSS?
One of my side reasons for reading a ton of RSS feeds was entertainment, getting a feel for what's new and exciting in the world. When I get that information through Twitter in a faster, easier-to-digest form, why would I trawl through RSS feeds? Hence why I don't.
There are still some sites worth checking on a daily or near-daily basis, and I usually just read them in a browser.
However, none of this means the format's dead, just that RSS as a means of information aggregation might be slightly ill.
Twitter AND RSS have taken over more than 50% of my browsing habits, though.
Unread (77)
Of course, this might require consumer-level eye ball tracking to see if you "read" one
I just stumbled up on this too, which is probably a better idea: http://www.voiceoftech.com/swhitley/?p=408
Can you follow hacker news updates on twitter?
The stupid kind of question following stupid hypes.