Xavier Niel will open a "revolutionary" computer school
google.com
google.com
For a bit of cultural context, higher education in France works quite differently from the US: it's mostly tax-funded; what we call cheap education is a couple hundreds € a year, full medical insurance included; a very expensive school would be €4-6€ a year. The best schools are cheap (a few select ones even offer a modest salary to their students). The worse ones, "universités", are cheap as well. Expensive schools are in the middle, for kids of wealthy parents who do OK at school, but aren't good enough to pass the best schools' very selective entry competitions.
Of course, these institutions being run by academics and civil servants, they aren't exactly reactive nor modernist; I've recently read a prominent school official explaining that Wikipedia wasn't trustworthy because it was user-editable, as opposed to journalists' papers... They offer a very solid mathematical and scientific background, but usually not much in terms of immediately employable skills. I'm not sure whether it's a good or a bad thing: school ought to teach you what you won't learn by yourself, the rest you'll pick up at your first employment, in exchange for a junior salary. But I've got the impression that schools filter mathematically-gifted student more than they train them.
Niel seems to concur, and to believe that maths/science gifts don't correlate well with actual development skills. Even if it's not true, there certainly are potentially skilled developers who do poorly at maths and science, and this talent pool is totally unexploited today, so he's right to try and valorise it.
42 is a programmer school, totally free of charge, with a "peer to peer" approach to education (whatever it means)
It'll take 4000 students and, after a marathon month (15 hours of programming a day), keeps the 1000 best.
I've been convinced for quite a long that epitech is a scam that just works because of the enormous demand for IT graduates in the industry. Insert money, get a diploma. Making a free version now, that could change things. Color me skeptic but curious.
Disclaimer: I'm a former epitech student, although I dropped out in 3rd year.
The concept of 42 is really the same that Epitech (but free), but I'm wondering how they will be able to apply it on a whole new school (since it means that the p2p model will not work for the first promotion, and that there isn't any school network). Furthermore, I'm wondering why it's free. "If you don't pay you're the product". So I'm a bit cautious.
It will be revolutionary for startups and other enterprises: in France, the lack of developer is high, and it's painful for startups to find people (searching for one year before you find or even more). I'm sure this is not a free school. Students will be the next Niel's friends employee, they will be inexpensive interns (in France, an internship that longs less than 3 months can legally be unpaid). Enterprises wants people who knows corporates methods and how to work in an "agile" way (I mean agility for business). But employee don't care of business in France.
A real revolution for business, not for students. Developers don't need Niel to make their own revolution.
I understood that it would be based around doing a bunch of projects with peers and learning how to find information on the internet vs. learn it from a course/book.
So, how is this different from being a self-taught programmer? Does the peer interaction help that much? Are there any instructors to guide in any way?
Personally I'm a self-taught programmer (starting at age 10). I had slight pushes from my dad, and some peer influence from high school friends who were also self-taught programmers. Then I went to college and added a bunch of theoretical knowledge and more breadth (topics I didn't think to study) and depth (topics that I didn't care enough about to dive into on my own). Most of my practical ability to work is self-taught or on-the-job experience, but the schooling does help provide a better foundation for it.
So this sounds like it's meant to be a kick-starter to get people to be self-taught who didn't already teach themselves. Or is it more about getting some kind of "degree" so they are hire-able? (Whether a degree is legally necessary or just practically necessary.)
If it's just like Epitech, it means that the teachers will be the students. 2nd-year teaching to 1st-year, etc. It's not as bad as it sounds, since it's possible to pick the 'best candidates'.
Also, I really think that peer interaction helps a lot. You definitely learn something when you have to work with people which does not have the same mindset than yours. You also have to deal with a lot of things such as "do not work with your friends", or "if you fail, the whole group fails", or "always have a leader in a team" etc.
He's certainly not a philanthropist, and he's probably smarter than most of us, so he might have ulterior motives that we don't see yet, but it won't be a straightforward "cheap degree for good money" scam.
I know some of the people involved, wish them all the best. Niel, of course, has a maverick reputation, it's a pleasure to follow what he does.
I think this move is very smart: both a great way to give back to society and to find more talent.
Based on what the website and press releases say, it seems like it will be closer to a 1-month long, 15 hours per day coding session. I wouldn't call that a "mini hack-a-thon".
They use the term "piscine" (pool), which is the term already used for a similar training step at Epitech (founded by the same Nicolas Sadirac mentioned in the article), another private tech-focused school based on similar ideas of "code, only code".