Show HN: my weekend project - Bookmarks made serviceable
memorypool.io
memorypool.io
Quick bug report, there is a display issue when one's browser window (or screen) isn't wide enough, it chops off whatever is meant to be at the right hand side at the top: http://i.imgur.com/GfNtJcv.png
Another issue is that sub-memorypools with identical names can be created. Not sure if that is intentional or not.
Also a suggestion, I think that dragging a bookmark icon on top of a memorypool icon should move it into there.
edit: good remark. Memorypools are links too. So if you create two memorypools with the same name, they will "point" on the same "desktop" as expected :)
Two more issues: http://i.imgur.com/uBpTr0m.png - somehow managed to get two links superimposed ("meteor" and "j"), and moving blocks of links took a rather long time.
You can drag an item to below the fold and it extends the screen and adds a scrollbar. This then causes the logout and the number (which is?) next to it to stack looking weird.
It's weird having to drag a select box to select only one item. Took me a minute to figure out you could even do that (remembered it was based off desktop) but before I was grabbing one, moving it, and then dropping which leaves it selected before I could delete.
Folders have a %20 in the name at the top once you enter them, but no on the icon display.
I notice now what you mention but still hard to discover on your own. Perhaps implementing the Windows double click type functionality (as a setting?) would be familiar to most (as in, most people use Windows) as people are used to one click to select and a quick double click to open. But this also seems to put more emphasis on editing / the interface than the actual functionality.
But, lately, I've been moving to a more search-driven experience where I can add content/bookmarks/files/whatever to the system and forget about them until I need them later, so I'm not sure if this would scale to the number of bookmarks I've been adding lately.
But, still, neat. At the very least, I see some potential in this approach for curated "launchers", sharing sets of bookmarks with others.
I can't speak for anyone else, but these days I use bookmarking as a contingency, in case I remember later and need or want the link to whatever. So, I'll bookmark just about anything and everything I might possibly remember, regardless of real value or intention. In the past, I used bookmarks to represent an active intention to go back and follow up on whatever, so I would carefully curate and organize my collection.
Your project seems like it would be very useful for the latter. And these days, for me, the latter comes up most often when I also intend to share the collection with others. For example, sharing a set of bookmarks to websites covering candidates or ballot issues in a local election.
I thought a little bit about sharing and social but I didn't see exactly yet how it works, but I will work on that of course. Your comments will definitely help me to orient things, thank you so much for them.
But nor would I be surprised if a lot of people took the search-oriented approach these days, as that's a common approach not just with bookmarks but with all kinds of content.
Personally, I very rarely take the intentional, curated approach. The example I gave, about sharing a collection of bookmarks relevant to local voters, is the only time in recent memory that I took the time to properly manage a set of bookmarks. And by "in recent memory", I mean in the last 5 years.
I'm reminded of http://www.allmyfaves.com/ (although you've obviously improved on their concept dramatically). If you're looking for a way to monetize your project, I believe they do pretty well just off of affiliate links (for the ecommerce sites).
As for feedback I saw in comments so far, first thing would be search and organizing in groups like win8 does. Then tagging as alternative way to organize would be good. Overall really nice.
[1] https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/new-tab-redirect/i...
Personally, I use a tagging model because it's easy and quick enough to catch back up.
Can we have a bookmarklet or chrome extension for this? Just a click and the website should be added. I'm using G+'s +1 for this so far.
Yes we can :) Thanks for your suggestion.
Play with this tool: http://colorschemedesigner.com/
Currently you have a color scheme based on similar brightnesses of very similar hues—green and blue are very close together on the color wheel, thus it's difficult to tell them apart and in some sense they "clash" with each other.
The grey you've chosen is also very similar in brightness, which makes the whole theme quite low contrast, and thus difficult to read.
Analogistic color schemes like this can work, but they need to be relatively high contrast so that there's enough of a difference in perceived color to make text readable and transitions more clear. And to prevent clashing, which is just generally perceived as unpleasing.
I'd go with your little memory-chip icon. Take the green off of that (#60B660) and the chip grey (#424242) and choose a contrasting accent color. You can go with a blue, but I wouldn't recommend it, and if you do I'd go with either very dark or very light used in places where it won't clash (such as maybe the top nav bar). Against the green, I'd use an orange or red or magenta in there, or just go with one main color and adjust brightnesses as needed (pretty failsafe).
Something like this would be similar to what you have, but with a better accent than blue (dark magenta) : http://www.colourlovers.com/palette/132637/Odd_but_trendy
Here's an analogistic color scheme that works due to the contrast and hue separation: http://www.colourlovers.com/palette/81885/Hymn_For_My_Soul
It's hard to explain how good color schemes are really created, other than by following the color wheel somewhat and your sense of aesthetic above all, but you can take any of these as a start for reference on what's "good." -- http://www.colourlovers.com/palettes/most-loved/past-month/m... -- Yours isn't too bad, there's just something off about it due to the low-contrast high-similarity colors used. Cheers.