Except it doesn't, not when improvement is so dramatic.
If he rewrote Python in Ruby, the perf would have been more or less the same.
If he rewrote in C, he would get even better perf but at much bigger cost (in dev time).
The point of his article is that Go is almost as easy to write in as Python but gives you 10x perf and that's why Go is attractive. It has the right perf/coding effort ratio.