Why our product went viral in Brazil for the wrong reasons
dafacto.com
dafacto.com
Anyway, watch the video if you can, it's worth the minute.
I hope this wasn't a problem for too many people, because (tongue in cheek here) I'm positive everyone reads the articles first before coming to read the comments.
That said, I don't think objclxt's comment spoils the fun of the video because even in the video he explains what Rego means before getting to the funny stuff.
If you haven't seen the video (Rego == Buttcrack):
Your Rego is private. Nobody can see what you put in your
Rego. But we know that sometimes you wanna share your Rego
with a friend, and we make that easy!
[1] https://github.com/panicsteve/cloud-to-buttI am glad you have seen the funny site of things.
The thing is, it's probably one of those "only funny once" things, so I doubt that the next company trying it would be so successful. (That, and the original company, man, if they were planning it? they were /subtle/ - and that made it way better. It's totally believable as an accident. that'd be a difficult thing to follow up on.)
This isn't the first time a brand has had to rethink its name to adjust to the local language. The Ford Pinto was re-dubbed when it entered Brazil because pinto in Portuguese is a word reserved for the male anatomy. It also happens the other way: the Nissan 350Z from the 80s was called the Fair Lady in Japan, which would likely never have resonated with its target demographic in the U.S.
EDIT: I've just learned that "Siri" sounds like a word, 尻, that means "ass" in Japanese. [1]. So I suppose this is the funniest name since Siri.
For Gizmodo it is an absolute win - lots of sharing. For Rego, I am sure it is a short-term win. But at the long-term there are a lot of challenges to make the transition from novelty to consolidate, real value delivering app.
My 2 cents would be, keep the branding as a purpousely funny. Rego is a funny bad word, but not one that a newspaper can't publish. It's not that strong. Also it is very well known, but, at the same time, is not that commonly used so people won't associate it to a brand.
Just some tips if you decided to invest in this branding
Orkut was great stuff. Every time they went down, I'd get paged (if on call that week) because every single person in Brazil would go back to the login page and start submitting the form over, and over, and over...
I wasn't on-call for Orkut, but rather something else it depended on. All of that login load translated through to us. It got to the point where we'd interpret a load spike as "let's check Orkut" and when it got to "yep, it's down", we'd just ignore it.
i start to use it in 2004.. i guess facebook was not even dreaming to born.. i guess i've stop to use it in 2008.. too many people.. to many noise.. and stop for the same reason that now i dont use facebook anymore..
is interesting with few early adopters friends.. (they have a high intelectual standard in median) .. but then.. everybody start to use it and say every #$% they are doing..
theres nothing magical about who get the top on the list.. they were there, in the right time.. and got the right sort of luck :)
Everyone laughed so hard that the app itself didn't matter anymore.
Also, check out http://www.habbo.com/, which means the same thing (ass crack).
As a product guy and general geek, I want to believe that naming doesn't matter. It's the product and the value it creates that counts. I'm increasingly learning that that's not entirely true. Having a great product is critical, but you also need to market it, and a name that evokes emotional responses helps.