All This Over a Dongle?
jerichoattrition.wordpress.com
jerichoattrition.wordpress.com
1. You like money. 2. You want to sustain your girlfriend's lifestyle.
But, 1 conflicts with 2 because 2 will cause a drain in your financial resources.
Instead of saying "you have to make money to sustain girlfriend's lifestyle" (which is a way to bridge two conflicting emotions together), what would you say instead? "I can't do both. :("?
the ada project was behind another recent sexism scandal involving a harm reduction presentation meant to be given by violet blue [1].
[1] http://violetblue.tumblr.com/post/44107008572/what-happened-...
While it's probably insensitive to talk about like that, I'm even more scared of those who try to turn policy and ethics debates like that into "my way or the highway" topics by turning every opposing viewpoint into thoughtcrime.
Certainly sexual assault of any type should not be tolerated, but should a conference organizer report all types of sexual assault that occur at a conference only as a flat "rape", or is it OK to split into further categories? And how can you sanely debate policy at all when you will simply be silenced if your opinion does not conform?
More details:
http://adainitiative.org/2012/10/open-source-software-open-t... http://blog.valerieaurora.org/2012/10/29/the-linux-community...
[1] http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Rape_apology_on_LCA_maili...