Hacker News Reader

That's probably because freedom of speech and freedom from unlawful search are perceived as rights that can wax and wane, but can always be restored.

The loss of the right to bare arms is perceived as an end-game. Once disarmed, there's no going back.

View on HN

The same can be said about any policy -- verification is very easy with the 2nd Amendment because it's clear and obvious to consumers on a personal level however censorship and surveillance are difficult to measure and quantify.

I agree. That's why I carefully used the word "perceived."

"The loss of the right to bare arms"- I really hope they don't ban t-shirts!

Haha. Forgive my spelling.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com