Cyprus parliament delays vote on deposit levy to Monday
reuters.com
reuters.com
WTF?
"But I can tell you that for people serving in our military, people serving our government out in Cyprus – because we have military bases there – we are going to compensate anyone who is affected by this bank tax. People who are doing their duty for our country in Cyprus will be protected from this Cypriot bank tax."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/mar/17/cyprus-savings-l...
Cyprus banks are short about €16B that the Cyprus government does not have. They went to the EU/IMF and got €10B, leaving a €6B hole. In the normal course of events, the bondholders would lose everything (not significant for Cyprus banks; they're financed by deposits), accounts with over €100k would lose around 30% of the amount over €100k, and all other depositors would lose nothing.
Instead, the bond holders lose nothing, the depositors with over €100k lose only 9.9%, and the retirees and Cypriots with less than €100k in their accounts lose 6.75%.
In other words, ordinary savers are having their life savings confiscated in order to protect bondholders and Russian mobsters.
And, again, these savers are citizens of a EU country and Eurozone member who have been promised deposit insurance by their national government with the implicit promise that this would be backstopped by the EU, IMF, ECB. But their interests, it seems, are less important than the interests of the Russian oligarchs; after all we can't have them losing a significant amount of their uninsured deposits....
When the banks started to fail, the bailout team had three options. It could refuse aid and let the Cypriot economy crater - Iceland, in a similar position in 2007, crashed 60% and is still 1/3 below pre-crash levels. It could also extend loans in exchange for austerity, similar to what was done elsewhere. This would mean the 1/2 of Cypriot deposits from Russia, Britain, and Greece would run for the doors, leaving the islanders to deal with the banks themselves. Or they could do something fast.
Europe has no euro-wide deposit insurance. When you leave the weak to completely fend for themselves they sometimes fall, and they often break. This exacerbates the differences between the strong and weak in a way that is often damaging for everyone.
P.S. When any government mismanages its finances, someone takes losses. Sometimes it's as a one-off tax, sometimes as a permanent tax increase, sometimes as a reduction in benefits, and often times as inflation or default.
So far Iceland appears to be doing better than Ireland:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-20936685
"By mid-2012 Iceland was regarded as one of Europe's recovery success stories. It has had two years of economic growth. Unemployment was down to 6.3% and Iceland was attracting immigrants to fill jobs. Currency devaluation effectively reduced wages by 50% making exports more competitive and imports more expensive. Ten year government bonds were issued below 6%, lower than some of the PIIGS nations in the EU (Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece, and Spain). Tryggvi Thor Herbertsson, a member of parliament, noted that adjustments via currency devaluations are less painful than government labor policies and negotiations. Nevertheless, while EU fervor has cooled the government continued to pursue membership"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008%E2%80%932011_Icelandic_fin...
Here's an oversimplification: basically by running always on deficit the various eurozone countries have reached closed to an unsustainable point: at one point where the country has too much public debt the country is trapped in the "debt trap". At that point there simply is no way that you can get out because the interest of the debt alone is impossible to be paid without contracting more and more debt.
That is what happened to Greece, for example, where a state default took place.
Now people know that states are going to default so nobody wants to buy government bonds anymore: so the states are basically forcing the banks to buy govt bonds (with a last resort using the BCE as a "bad bank").
So when a country defaults, lots of banks are suddenly virtually bankrupt: they either need a bail-out or go bankrupt. Should they go bankrupt that would deal a huge blow to the economy. Nobody wants Deutsche Bank or BNP Paribas going down: that would probably mean civil war and the end of the western world as we know it.
So states are basically forced to bail out these banks. But, guess what, states are already way too indebted. So they're contracting even more debt, making it even more likely that they'll default.
Cyprus' banks happened to hold lots of govt bonds from Greece. Hence they got fuxx0red when Greece defaulted on part of its state debt.
Now of course if Cyprus defaults, more banks are going to be bankrupt and need a bailout or trigger massive civil unrest... etc.
Because after Cyprus it's going to be Spain, Italy, Portugal... In 2014 it's very likely that France won't be able to finance itself on the market at reasonable rates.
Nigel Farage explained this quite well in a talk in front of the european parliament: this cycle / state default / bank bailout / more state default is endless.
So the eurocrisis is first and foremost a crisis due to the various governments being ruled by clueless monkeys who can't count ("It's all lawyers, lawyers, lawyers" as Neil deGrasse Tyson wrote) and who've been hiding state debt behind growth.
Add to that a gang of banksters sharks always willing to try to create more money out of thin air with crazy leveraging and you get the crazy situation we're in.
It's now gonna end well because if you try to "analyze the curves" you realize we're going into a wall.
There is no way out.
Now of course the various politicians, most notably the socialist ones, are trying to tell us it's all the fault of liberalism and banksters but the cold hard truth is that when you run a country always on deficit at one point it becomes unsustainable.
Sweden got this in 1993 and in 20 years they went from a public sector representing 67% of the GDP to 49% today, meanwhile lowering they public debt from 70% of the GDP to 30%.
And that's a socialist country. And that's something socialists in the eurozone simply do not understand: the public sector is way too important, the private sector is way too taxed and we're going into a wall.
The solution is less state.
This crisis would be so funny, if it would occur on any continent I don't live on.
The depositors are being rescued here. They trusted their money to banks that went on to make loans to the Greek government. The Greek government defaulted. A significant portion of the depositors money is gone. Nobody is confiscating anything. International institutions are helping Cyprus, by covering part of the losses. Unfortunately there is nobody willing to pay the amount necessary to make the depositors full again.
One might argue that this is bad, and that the EU/IMF/ECB should make the depositors full, without an haircut, but that is another story.
On the other hand, that €10B euro could have come from somewhere outside the country, especially since it was the forced Greek bond haircut that caused the crisis. I find it hard to believe that northern Europe isn't taking advantage of this crisis to increase their influence.
In the USA, taking 7+% of everyone's savings on short notice would initiate a civil war. Can't imagine how another alternative would be worse.
Bottom line its all about the natural gas.
As in: bank with us because we are financially sound (instead of: because we pay higher interest, or whatever). It's not happening yet.
There is nothing to stop customers banking on this basis. They still don't, perhaps largely because the government insures up to $1xx,xxx in deposits (I forget the number) so a lot of people are covered no matter what happens to their bank.