Western internet censorship: The beginning of the end or the end of the beginning?
wikileaks.org
wikileaks.org
So moral issues aside, this is a huge waste of effort no matter which way you turn it.
With Tor it is so easy to go around these things that you install a program and push a button to have your trafic bypass any and all national filters, if only more people dared to put up servers so Tor wasn't so extremely slow.
- Edward's law
The problem, I think, is precisely the one you highlight:
> If only more people dared to put up servers
"Society" can make it so that it's "dangerous" (for given values) and, more importantly, uninteresting (for the masses) to use the new tech, and thus it remains a non-solved problem, which could herald a bleaker future.
http://nielsolson.us/Haversian/2008/06/fascist_bias_in_censo...
The problem with them is that they work a little too well. I'm probably in the 99th percentile (globally) in what I will defend as "free speech" and even I can't stomach the idea of running a Freenet node, between the content I'm not willing to defend as free speech, and the content that I may be willing to defend as free speech but have no desire to subsidize monetarily. It's going to be challenging getting much critical mass out of a system that can carry wikileaks-type info.
One side of me feels like, it seems OBVIOUS that this kind of things (censorship) have been going on since a very long time, and that we may not be living the worse moment of human history concerning that matter.
But on the other hand, i can't help but feel like the power to punish people trying to circumvent censorship has never been so great and ubiquitous.
I'm in Australia. I tried to look at wikileaks last night, it was "down" - the first thing that came to mind was being blocked. It was only after I asked some overseas friends on IM that I knew it was actually down down.
It's just like a free trip to China! I loved playing the "will this web site load" game there too - now I can play it at home!