Porn Site Breaks Down Searches By Country
techcrunch.com
techcrunch.com
I don't know how representative the samples are, nor how correct my impression is, but I found it interesting.
Would need data on traffic by country to clarify that. If this kind of thing is important to you, that is...
It seems more likely the results are dominated by searches from one person, especially when there are no results for Slovakians or most of the Balkan states at all.
As for Gay Grandpas, well searching for "Gay Grandpa Sex" [4] yields 29 700 results.
[1]: http://www.pestiside.hu/20100128/police-raid-the-only-effect...
[2]: http://www.nol.hu/archivum/archiv-506693
[3]: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1018310/
[4]: https://encrypted.google.com/search?hl=en&q=meleg%20nagy...
(edit: formatting)
1) mature 2) granny 3) male ejaculation (gay)
1) Kentucky's #1 search term is "free gay porn" - pretty specific relative to all the other terms elsewhere
2) Iowa's #6 is "backroom casting couch" but Wyoming's #3 is "brcc". That's either poor data warehousing practices, or an intentional choice to say "People who type the term in are differentiated from people who use the acronym." I'm assuming that it's poor data warehousing or small sample size given how "milf" is in almost every state but not one state has the fully-spelled out version.
3) Mississippi's results are skewed relative to what most people think about Mississippi. For a state that is supposed to be 60% Caucasian[1], their top search terms are not very Caucasian-like. I'm thinking small sample size here.
4) Connecticut's #10 result is "lisa ann"
5) Maine has both "ebony" and "black" as top search terms
6) Most of the South American listings have some variation of the country name.
7) Every result in Peru is gay. Clearly this is either small sample size, marketing, or "other".
I'm surprised more people aren't focusing on the "dirty data" (pun intended). Clearly something is weird with the data - it's either working on small sample sizes, or there's been some poor work done to get it to this point (not enough work done, for example).
good points though.
Israel's #3 search was "college rules". Not "college".
Nigeria's #3 search was "things i jack off to".
What better way to establish yourself "The World's Biggest Porn Search Engine." than having non-porn media legitimize you for free?
Any reasonably frequently updated personal blog that covers a wide-ish range of topics will have some truly bizarre search traffic referrals.
(or maybe it was just mine? Perish the thought..)
There's a whole subgenre of gay porn featuring 'straight' men having sex with other men.
It varies from 'guys who look "passably" straight' to 'guys who are "straight" and have girlfriends but get tricked/coerced into having sex with other men".
which makes sense. Non-tolerance will make anonymous/private transactions more appealing.
http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/hate-map for comparison...
What is really going on: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Black_belt_counties.png
Also you have a disproportionate number of historically black colleges in the South as compared to the rest of the US. Upper-middle black households are more likely to send their kids to schools like Spelman and Morehouse and if kids like anything, they like sex.
[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:New_2000_black_percent.gi...
Blacks are still a minority in these places. I know they are a minority in Louisiana, Texas and Mississippi. I think it is probably a combination of blacks and whites searching on 'Ebony' that makes it come out on top in the data. Just as in California I strongly suspect a combination of Asians and Whites searching on 'Asian' places that term high in their data.
Sure there are probably quite a few white people that also search for ebony porn. But I doubt it's that much higher amongst whites in the south vs. whites in the north. And even if it is, it's probably not a correlation to racism as the parent post was implying.
That's an interesting question. It would be illustrative to get the data for that. My own wager would be that it is slightly higher... just as searches by whites on 'Asian' is slightly higher in California than it is in ... say ... North Dakota. But that data would be telling.
In any case... I do agree with you that it's not "cross burning racism" that is driving these searches. My own suspicion is that it's probably more a matter of simply close 'proximity' combined with the natural difficulty of starting those relationships in the first place.
But of course data would be needed to validate any of this.
I see what you're saying, and I think you'd likely be correct. Would be interesting to see how high of a difference that might potentially be, would need the hard data instead of an infographic unfortunately :/
The presence of places like Spelman probably magnifies the effect. I'd wager that if you put the college for the daughter's of the nation's elite blacks in the middle of say... Iowa... the number of searches on 'Ebony' would shoot up in Iowa as well.
edit: as other people noted, the sample size is probably too small there.
I am curious but also slightly worried about what it will be.