If deployment and testing is something that everyone has to do in a very similar way should it not be a problem that is solved by the framework the same way that sessions are?
If deployment and testing is something that everyone has to do in a very similar way should it not be a problem that is solved by the framework the same way that sessions are?
The rails community from the beginning has had a more holitstic view of the problem it is solving.
The third tab on the rails site is about deployment. There are three performance monitoring companies and 6 different rails specific hosts.
Other examples: db schema evolution (migrations) and rake tasks. There is also a litany of useful maintance tools you can find on github.
This is not just in reference to code either, its everything else too, including documentation.
I like django, I prefer django, but in this one critical area, the last mile, rails does better. And its frustrating because its not a hard problem.
Some of the testing stuff is "in-house".
It's not even close to true that everyone's deployment is (or should be) very similar. It's a bit more arguable that everyone's testing should be similar. But forcing one way is not the Django way and one of the big reasons it is loved.