Come and help save Posterous from oblivion
jacquesmattheij.com
jacquesmattheij.com
My favorite kind of leadership, and an example of the (double-edged) sword of instant communication: people can be rallied around time-sensitive causes, like SOPA or posterous shutting down.
I know this seems a little obvious, but it's striking how rare it actually seems to be. I'm curious why. Maybe it's just my perception and it's happening all the time. Certainly people are doing great things, but I'm curious why we haven't yet seen more specific, directed actions like this. Does it depend on relatively homogeneous communities like Reddit (SOPA) and HN (this)? If there is a proliferation of such communities, say subreddits or otherwise, could we expect this to happen more frequently? Do we want it to happen more frequently, or do we run the risk of, say, DHS running a pro-search campaign like China's 50 cent army? I'm just curious about why this seemed so striking to me.
This also fits in with an article I'd been meaning to read by Fukuyama[0] on social capital written 15 years ago.
The vice of modern democracy is to promote excessive individualism, that is, a preoccupation with one's private life and family, and an unwillingness to engage in public affairs. Americans combated this tendency towards excessive individualism by their propensity for voluntary association, which led them to form groups both trivial and important for all aspects of their lives.
Perhaps we'll see more of these spontaneous actions as voluntary associations are easier to make as the infrastructure that supports them (e.g. reddit) becomes more well known and fine-tuned.
[0] http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/seminar/1999/reforms/fuk...
> I made an offer to continue to host posterous.com and all the stuff on it but never received an answer.
Has Twitter completely lost touch with the web community? Is it possibly to get a response from them these days if you're not an advertiser?
Fun story about Facebook: when I first wanted to start spending decent amounts with them (decent not huge - $10,000s/month) a few months ago I literally could not get in touch with a single person. Even completing contact forms I wasn't hearing back from them. A friend who used to work for an SEO/SM company told me a name of someone to contact, I used LinkedIn's InMail (a paid feature) to message him, and 24 hours later I had 3 account managers (including a technical expert, a media strategist and an overall account manager), who answer calls to their mobiles at any time of day. Now I have a nice route to get answers on any topic, not just paid advertising, thanks to my spending. (Was actually shocked about how hard it was initially to make contact and give them money, too.)
(I have everything up and running according to your short guide and am working on the posterous project, though my contribution will probably limited to under 100GB due to bandwidth cap considerations. Btw, how much disk space does posterous in its entirety take?)
I can assure you that you will not use up very much space nor bandwidth :-) It's mostly text and all. Feel free to stop by the project IRC Channel which is #preposterus on EFNet for specific questions (if they aren't answered in the FAQ or HN thread already)
jacquesm's a member of the ArchiveTeam now by the way ;-) And so are you, since you're helpin'!
We are helping users move to tumblr & save their blog. So far moved 500000+ posts (mostly small blogs). But we are not able to help all the users who have multiple images and videos in a post. Currently we support only single image & audio posts. If we can find a way to host their files separately on S3 permanently, then the move would be effortless & many would thank.
There are so many users who don't understand what to do with their backup, for them moving to wordpress is too complex task.
I have reached out to Sachin aggarwal, but yet to hear a positive reply. Tumblr also rejected to host the files of Posterous blogs.
We are ready to collaborate with anyone who can host users file permanently, if needed users can pay directly to you. We were also considering dropbox for hosting files. Moving to new blog platform is a pain and we wanted to minimize as much as possible.
Any advice is appreciated (http://justmigrate.com)
Got all the answers I need here (though I might drop by the channel to say hi). It's actually quite funny to see the traffic graph spike as it makes a successful connection, then lulls for a while as certain pages keep giving 502 responses. I definitely see why you guys need IPs more than bandwidth!
Glad to help out :)
We do take those in consideration and back off exponentially until we hit 32 seconds - but continue retrying for specific set of times.
You're very welcome to join us on IRC. Thanks for being interested!
Sachin Agarwal, you used this community to enrich yourself and further your own career. In return, at the very least, you owe an explanation for why such a convoluted effort has to be made to get this content off the servers.
It's also exceptionally discourteous to ignore emails from upstanding community members, but perhaps you missed these. But I know for sure that you will read this thread, so I'd love to hear why a database dump can't be provided, or a couple of IPs whitelisted to just rip through a scrape.
Maybe you can get to it before the Wayback Machine does.
$ sudo apt-get install virtualbox-ose
$ wget http://archive.org/download/archiveteam-warrior/archiveteam-warrior-v2-20121008.ova
$ tar xf archiveteam-warrior-v2-20121008.ova
$ VBoxManage import archiveteam-warrior-v2-20121008.ovf
$ screen
$ VBoxHeadless --vnc --startvm archiveteam-warrior-2
Hit Ctrl+A, D to exit screen and leave the VM running. From a non-headless box: $ ssh -L8001:localhost:8001 you@yourserver.com
Point a browser to http://localhost:8001EDIT: Added 'screen' to steps. You're gonna wanna use screen.
VBoxManage startvm archiveteam-warrior-2 --type headless
which would replace VBoxHeadless and remove the requirement for screen. You will need another VBoxManage command to setup VNC if you desire to use that.Bring back so many memories about the early days :)
http://www.reocities.com/Area51/vault/5058/
Just change the 'g' from geocities to the 'r' of reocities.
We've (ArchiveTeam) unfortunally made Posterous unresponsive multiple times. So please be careful to not completely bring it down if you're doing a solo effort.
Please also bear in mind that it's not just to "chuck it into the downloader"..
We're using WARC (Web Archive) which is an official ISO File Format standard - which the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine can use. It's also a pretty good and nice format for archiving web pages in general.
I'm using caution because we don't want to sink Posterous, since it's a very fragile beast, which we're blowing away the caches off of.
We're working on getting a FAQ section up on the project page. (http://www.archiveteam.org/index.php?title=Posterous)
Rather inconclusive, though.
items: 1470951 done, 1467514 to do
[url to leaderboard deleted upon request]
(NB: it does look like this thing has been underway since Feb 27)
Also, unfortunally - those numbers aren't totally up to scratch. Please hang on, we'll have a FAQ describing that in a moment.
You're very welcome to join up our IRC channels!
Yes we can. Through the 'progression of technology' as you put it, I believe we will never come close to any limit. Just look at how much data is stored in DNA, and you'll see that our current data storage technologies are relatively primitive.
Sure, there's plenty of spam accounts and crappy content - but that might prove worthful in the future. Maybe someone would study what kind of content we as a race were contributing to that kind of platform, in this day and age - maybe someone is researching the automated spam.
This is not really taking up all that much space, in this day and age. There's around 2.2 TB downloaded - it's mostly text and images. That's half a single 4TB drive. Not really storage capacity to fight about in my opinion.
We're thinking about this right now. Feel free to hang around #preposterus on EFNet for updates.
Some is better than none :-)
It's however very unlikely that they'd just release that data. They probably have their own archive format and things as well..
To preserve my own blog I just saved it as a pdf with wkhtmltopdf, but it'd be nice to have a full HTML version.
http://blog.andrewcantino.com/blog/2013/03/12/archive-a-pdf-...
Websites owned and operated by individuals are now vanishingly rare, while aggregations of people -- Facebook, Twitter, et. al. -- have become the norm.
Example individual website: http://arachnoid.com/
Especially since nothing lasts forever, like we clearly see here. When a giant falls..
magnet:?xt=urn:btih:b1b3df637bf9bb78f32e1667944535b60c9d37c1&dn=archiveteam-warrior-v2-20121008.ova
Sha1 of image, in case you want to verify.
Have you tried making a public appeal (say, over twitter) to the Posterous owners? They may be able to talk with Twitter and arrange to capture the content directly
Feel free to stop by our project IRC channel at #preposterus (Note: It's not spelled pre-posterous) or our main channel at #archiveteam on EFNet
I guess so; I have a 200Mbit fiber connection but surprisingly little is happening.
I started the instance 10 minutes a go and it has only uploaded 20MB. I've set 'concurrent items' and 'rsync threads' to the max.
Because of this, we practically hit the back end every time (as well as other users of Posterous, because we blow the cache away) - which makes Posterous very slow.
We've ran a few hundered more threads earlier, successfully making Posterous completely unavailable unfortunally.
In this effort, bandwidth in itself is not that important. Feel free to read some of my other posts in this thread regarding bandwidth and/or come join us at IRC (#preposterus at EFNet)
Why would someone do that?
Well, a lot of people have poured their hearts out and made content that lives on Posterous. They might miss the "sunsetting" (asshole term) of the service and lose their content.
Think of all the dead links that'll be around after the service have died. Wouldn't you be able to read something great that was linked from HN a year ago? From the Wayback Machine or similar?
There's plenty of reasons to archive the web and the content that goes up (and down).
Besides, I think Posterous would be a good complement to 140 char-twitter. I don't even consider them as competition to each other..