PeopleBrowsr wins federal court case against Twitter

This is after the Google vs Oracle, the 2nd court case of API Neutrality enforcement. http://api500.com/post/31465739810/what-is-api-neutrality

Off topic: I wanted to read the court doc at the end of the article, but it was nigh impossible[1] because the page uses only 728px out of the available 1278px width on the content. Reading articles on TheNextWeb feels as comfortable as riding a train during rush hour.

[1] https://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/shepscreens/Screen+Shot+2...

All you had to do was click the button to expand it and open in a new page, which takes you to this: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_j33dtkT8LLNzhWZnhNb1hWYWs/...

my odd issue with their site is that pageup/pagedn do not scroll properly, they are moving a line or two too far.

Still trying to understand why Twitter must be forced to renew a contract in how they sell their data. I do not see how a company can sue to force another company to sell access to it.

Did they misspell people as 'peopel' (based on the url)?

Probably a CMS generated the URL based on the title which had a title and they fixed the original title but can't change the URL without breaking links.