Baidu rolls out world's first commercial deployment of Marvell ARM server
marvell.com
marvell.com
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/02/20/baidu_marvell_arm_se...
Even in a modern x86-64 bit architechture, you can do some limited 128 and 256 bit operations. This ARM may have a greater-than 32 bit memory addressing setup, but only support 32 bit opcodes for the main registers.
Further reading:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cortex_A15
http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4206387/ARM7-40bit-v...
To me, the real piece of information is near the bottom, "ower the total cost of ownership by 25 percent, compared with previous x86-based server solutions", this is where Intel's challenge really is.
It's not about performance, or even about Watts consumed, it's about the money spent to operate a service, from the very bottom of the stack where electricity is consumed, through the management of the application layer.
Server hardware is going to cost a lot less in the next couple of years, and Intel are going to have to work out how they can make money in this new environment, whether that's through going all out on low end kit, or moving up the management layer.
I'm not aware of anything like that for the newer ARM processors. There's an Ubuntu ARM AMI which lets you ssh straight into an ARM image.. running on QEMU on top of EC2. Not ideal.