I didn't downvote his post at first because it sounded like a genuine suggestion. I consider myself deceived.
I didn't downvote his post at first because it sounded like a genuine suggestion. I consider myself deceived.
The only way in which you could have been deceived is if you went into the discussion assuming no conflict of interest. Years of dealing with financial media and experts has rendered me incredibly cynical, so I focused on the author's claims (which, in this case, are true -- If the product acts as the website claims, the self-hosted solutions store credentials on your servers and not theirs.)
I recommend you read http://hastebin.com/raw/gefuxumubu, the zerohedge.com conflict of interest policy, for it drives home the key point that if you assume everyone has a conflict of interest you won't be deceived and you can focus on what was actually said
"We've seen many companies leak or improperly use your email addresses and other personal informations. The best solution is to host your own. Check out _____"
That would have been a proper sequitur and wouldn't come off as arbitrary pumping.
Oh how I wish that were the case, but there's a really strong mapping from HN and SV to finance (too much to mention in a reply, but I may try to flesh it out in a blog post one day)