Why socialism fails: Teacher fails entire class as example
faustiesblog.blogspot.co.uk
faustiesblog.blogspot.co.uk
Edit: Someone in the comments links to snopes
Ultimately I'd prefer to look at statistics and other facts to make policy decisions. Many countries have different levels of socialist policies so there is plenty of data to draw from.
I hate it when people present everything as a black and white situation. Apparently either we live in complete and utter free market anarchy with no oversight or accountability, or everybody gets the same wage no matter how hard they work.
Where do I fit in, if I want the market to be mostly free and private, but I don't mind some regulations to make sure there isn't cyanide in my cereal?
>Such students should think about finding something they actually like to learn even if there is no grading system or grading system is broken.
Because basic Econ is an elective? When did that happen? Most students take Econ because they have to. Many end up hating it because some Econ profs find a way to make it boring, or fail to demonstrate its relevance to their lives. Also, most freshmen suck at going to college.
> the professor told them that socialism would also ultimately fail because when the reward is great, the effort to succeed is great but when government takes all the reward away, no one will try or want to succeed.
That's obvious tripe. The mere existence of: most academic research, organ donors, bone-marrow donors, and scores of other low/no reward activities proves it false.
It's always been a pet-peeve of mine that so many have the opinion that every person's natural state would be lethargy or hedonism or some such, if work weren't required for survival.