People said the same thing about the huge, bulky cell phones that came out in the 1980s.
that's a strawman. The primary claim is that Google's implementation is lame.
The primary claim in not that 'Glass-type' hardware is lame.
that's a strawman. The primary claim is that Google's implementation is lame.
The primary claim in not that 'Glass-type' hardware is lame.
I can see your point about how he's attempting to argue the implementation is lame, but its also easy to construe his argument as 'glass-type' hardware is lame. This is an issue with the authors presentation, not with the OPs argument.
I started to extract and quote the parts of the article saying the problem is Google's implementation but it was close to being the entire article.