Is Microsoft Turning the Corner in the Consumer Space?
blog.pluralsight.com
blog.pluralsight.com
I was doubtful of the Lumia at first. But, I spent a good while playing with the device at the store. It is super smooth. The screen and camera are great. The only thing missing is the Square payments app. Which we use for our business. The app ecosystem makes the transition difficult.
But, overall using Skydrive has been great with the Surface. I look forward to seeing it work in conjunction with the Lumia.
Personally, I was thinking of moving from the Galaxy Nexus to Nexus 4. As much as I like using a clean version Jelly Bean, the Lumia hardware is calling my name.
As for Microsoft turning a corner, It still has a long way to go. Specifically, in its communications. Many of the features, I like about Surface do not get mentioned. The dancing commercials do not communicate functionality. For example, I use the microHDMI cable to connect Surface to a monitor. Then I can use Excel on a monitor and the web on the Surface. The USB port alone, has been a godsend on the go.
edit: from the same blog yesterday: http://blog.pluralsight.com/2013/02/22/video-unleash-the-pow...
I wonder if ColdFusion was the "Engadget Reader's Choice Web Framework of the Year".
Really the proof is in the pudding. I'll know Microsoft's mobile products are worth not comprehensively ignoring when there is a general consensus among trustworthy people that they've achieved at least ~20% overall market share. And if Microsoft has to try double hard to get there because of general suspicions about their past behavior then bully for them -- let it serve as a lesson to others that we have long memories and ruining your own reputation has consequences.
Also, isn't that what people do in reality anyway? I don't see an official version of e.g. Photoshop for Ubuntu, which I have to imagine would exist if it had >20% market share. And OS X does have >20% market share among those who use Photoshop, whereas pick your favorite non-web based line of business software and chances are it isn't available for OS X or Linux. Isn't that why everyone always says they aren't worth considering for business use? No software? Not enough market share?
The famous "we invented the first personal computer system". I guess nobody can never believe anything they say again.
Steam should probably stop selling games for OSX and Linux, as they don't represent anywhere near 20% of the market.
Or should we just cherry pick some stat where they are over 20%? Let's do that with Windows Phone 8 too then. I'm sure they are over 20% usage of something, or will be soon. >20% usage of One Note?
Or we could just judge technology on its merits, and take everything technology sites say about all of this stuff with a grain of salt.
Parent comment didn't even bother giving any examples.
Would you like to write up an encyclopedia of lies that Microsoft has told, or should I use your logic to assume that they must be more honest than Apple?
Personally I don't think either of them are trustworthy.
But astroturf is lying about the lie. Review sites are operating under the flag of representing the consumer rather than the vendor. So now we can't even trust the reviewers when they review anything for which the vendor has demonstrated a willingness to pay for reviews. Now how am I supposed to know whether one of their devices is any good or is just being reviewed by someone who is being paid to say nice things about it?
>Steam should probably stop selling games for OSX and Linux, as they don't represent anywhere near 20% of the market.
You're assuming that a heuristic has to be an inviolable law of nature in order to be useful. If it's right most of the time, that makes it right most of the time. You take the exceptions on a case by case basis when you have reason to suspect that the situation is an atypical one and the cost of further investigation is less than the likely benefit of obtaining more information.
>Or we could just judge technology on its merits, and take everything technology sites say about all of this stuff with a grain of salt.
So then what are we supposed to use to judge the technology on its merits if we can't rely on what technology sites say about it? If I'm trying to decide whether to buy something, I can't very well go out and buy it in order to determine for myself whether I should go out and buy it. These things cost hundreds of dollars or require long-term contracts, and then I would have significant opportunity costs in configuring it with all my information and then having to export it all back out again if I don't like it. Which is exacerbated significantly by Microsoft's prolific NIH syndrome. So if I can't rely on reviewers then I have to rely on something else to tell me whether it's any good, like the market.
Even if the market is wrong and the OS is not as mediocre as its share would indicate, the market is still right. App developers want to write for devices with users. Users want devices with apps. The device has to be a large enough improvement over the status quo to overcome that chicken and egg problem, and until it does, it's objectively worse for both developers and users than devices that already have. Microsoft has benefited from this dynamic for decades, it doesn't change just because now they're on the other side of it.
http://www.roughlydrafted.com/RD/Q4.06/D0BC712B-7DBA-46CA-AA...
http://paidcontent.org/2012/04/26/the-ethics-of-astro-turfin...
http://falkvinge.net/2012/03/02/how-microsoft-pays-big-money...
http://paidcontent.org/2011/11/15/419-the-story-behind-shopc...
http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=200...
http://www.angelfire.com/nj2/edcurry/astroturf.html
They started in the 90's and haven't stopped. I'm not aware of any of their competitors doing the same thing, though feel free to point out any instances you know of. Particularly the ones without the market success to back it up (e.g. RIM).
In the meantime, I'm thankful for my technet subscription so that I can make up my own mind.
Can't say the same about RT, though. I've heard very few positive comments...
And it's funny you say "hip iphone kids". I'm well out of the "kid" generation but I think the iphone has lost quite a bit of coolness this last year. They're just all the bloody same. I don't think I'm that big a snob but even I feel a pang of annoyance when I notice some bratty little schoolkid pulling out the exact same model phone I have. I get the vibe Android is considered a bit cooler now; it's certainly considered more individualistic.