Research Shows ADHD Increased by Food Additives
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
In this case I think a good potential omitted factor is the level of parental discipline. Suppose parents A are Dr. Spock laissez-faire with their kids. This is most likely correlated with: Not sitting still for the family meal Watching a lot of television Getting their way in public places So Junior gets lots of TV dinners, quick snacks, and time with the power rangers so he wants to do karate instead of read Fox in Socks
Parents B run a tight ship and consequently their vegan, free-range fed wonder-child is happy to sit on the magic carpet and hear about anything so long as it's not The Wealth of Nations again.
Applying the overused correlation != causation mantra is a bit cheap, to be fair we must follow the immediate next step, "If correlation != causation, why?" I think here we have plenty of compelling falsifiable narratives to try before we make green key-lime pie illegal.
I guess the affect is small and affects those predisposed.
Researchers found that supplementing problem kids with fish oil had dramatic effects. Youth offenders showed something like a 40% drop in recidivism vs the control. Low grade-level readers mostly rose to grade level within months.
The implication of this is that lousy food is causing criminality and stupidity. The UK government concluded from this research that it would be very cost effective to provide fish oil supplements to school children.
But here's the scary bit: there aren't enough fish in the world. Once they ran the numbers they found it would be impossible.
It was the first time researchers conclusively and scientifically confirmed a link that had long been suspected by many parents. Numerous support groups for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder have for years recommended removing such ingredients from diets, although experts have continued to debate the evidence.
So, the parents and support groups "knew" the answer before there was scientific evidence supporting their claims.
So, they didn't know, they just have an unscientific agenda.
Now the article acts like their position was validated. It was not. It's scientific status hasn't changed whether science happens to reach the same conclusion or not. They are irrational either way.
That's stupid too. Parents aren't going to monitor children's behavior scientifically. They aren't going to record it carefully and objectively and compare it to control data previously recorded. This advice will simply lead them to act on whims and fancies.